
It is 62 years since India got Independence. India’s political history may be young, but is certainly volatile. Many men and women have played their role in transforming India into a democracy. Surely, an integral part of democracy is free speech, right to an opinion, and that right must not be curtailed by a dogma or ideology.
That is the bases with which a dialogue becomes rich. Ideas and opinions co-exist despite differences in opinion. If this is curbed by one harangue, India will seize to be a democracy. (You merely need to look around the world to see how fascism curtails free speech.)
Different Voices Stand Together
Haven’t we had the sacred constitution of India written by Dr. Babasaheb Ambadkar. A man born into an untouchable family. He lived and died to be a voice against the injustices of discrimination, divisions of cast and creed, and yet such a man wrote our constitution. Here was a man who debated openly on the "Brahmincal" and the "untouchable" reality of India, and had his differences of opinion with Gandhi in public forums. He was opposed to Gandhi calling the daliths "Hari Jan" (men and women of God). They differed, and yet continued to move on constructively. Gandhi disagreed with Dr. Ambadkar on several grounds: Dr Ambadkar wanted separate electoral for the daliths, and Gandhi thought that would further divide the country. They agreed (after much deliberation) for reservation rights for greater representation of the daliths.
India laid the foundation for such diverse views. The country was hardly pulverized by such differences in arguments.
Today, Shasi Taroor, a sitting MP of the Congress, has through his many works been critical of India’s leaders - past and present. His works have often shown that for decades of congress rule, very little was done for the poorest of its people it represented, and, yet, he is welcome to be part of a political party. Should all his writings stand to be suppressed now?
Dr. Amarthya Sen, often mentions that he is still affiliated to the Left. The Left consider it an honor to have a man as learned as the Lobel Lauriate to be part of the party cadre. Should they, like plague, keep him out of their corridors?
Yes, on the other side, you also have caricaturist turned Hindutva leader who wears the saffron kaftan, who vociferously dictates that Chitrapathi Shivaji was a brave heart who fought against Mogul invasion of our land.
Delving into the Past - The Rise Of Jinna
When such is a scenario, I love to see India burning with issues acknowledging a need to re-look history – here the issue of Jinnah. It is beyond doubt that Jinnah was an astute lawyer and was highly gifted in his craft of oratory, tactical understanding, and persuasive thinking. He played a part that history cannot erase of being responsible for (what began in all earnest) India’s independence. He lived at a time when Hitler along with the European dictators like Mussolini had staged the art to hold the attention of people’s minds to convincing propaganda and blind faith. When such was a scenario, Jinna too realized that he could stage the birth of a new country. He did. He died soon after. Seeing that what he had created was after all bloody. It continues to be sadly a reminiscence of the way the land was created –with force, brutal anger, fire of destruction, and tears of its own people’s.
No ONE Man Divides A Country TWO
Jinnna surely was not the only force for the partition of India. There were other leaders too who were Prime Minister candidates seeking to rule a nation where the majority were Hindus. And it is not entirely incorrect about what Jaswanth brings to the table. This argument is in the collective consciousness of the Indian people.
History is Not as Smooth as a Beaten Ham
What is important is that such debates are necessary, despite the threat of being expelled from party leadership. Holding him entirely responsible for masterminding a division of land is preposterous. Just because our beloved neighbor today stands as our sworn enemy, does not mean we do not attempt to break the propaganda and consumerism of a new history. History is never as smooth as a beaten ham.
India needs debates to rise to the sky. A few dare to do it – may be it is a way to unlearn what has been taught to you. In this case, Jaswanth Sing severed long enough in a party that has been making its soul objective to re-claim and re-write history. May be Jaswanth Sing realizes that the ideologies dispensed by the BJP is not entirely true, and therefore an innate urge to state what he thinks otherwise needs to be made known.
At the End of Life, Truth Stares...
Just as Jinna was a saddened man when at his deathbed, to see his country burning, Jaswanth Sing too may be saddened that he served a Hindutva party for over 30 years (spent most of his prime file towards acknowledging the Hindutva ideology), and towards the end of an “active” political life, the past seems different and truth stares hard at you. Speaking out is the only sure way to redeem oneself of all the goblins that lie within.
That India needs. India needs these forked arguments, and counter arguments. Democracy can only thrive when people take a good stab at a given history.
~~~~*~~~~*~~~~*~~~~










